Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy
September 1, 1999
In general, officers and directors of corporations are subject to fiduciary
duties requiring them to act in the best interests of the corporation and its
shareholders. When a corporation enters the realm of insolvency, however,
officers and directors must consider not only the interests of the corporation
and its shareholders, but also the interests of its creditors.
When liquidation is the only viable option, officers and directors of
troubled corporations have typically chosen a traditional Chapter 7 bankruptcy
filing as their solution to the corporations' financial predicaments. Recently,
however, many corporations in Florida have considered alternatives to bankruptcy
when faced with financial difficulties. One such alternative is an assignment
for the benefit of creditors (Assignment Proceeding).
An Assignment Proceeding is a statutory device by which a corporate debtor
(the Debtor or Assignor) conveys all of its assets to a third party (Assignee)
to be liquidated and distributed pro rata to the creditors of the Debtor, with
any surplus being returned to the Debtor. This article will provide a brief
overview of an Assignment Proceeding utilizing Florida's assignment statute,
Chapter 727 of the Florida Statutes, as a model.
Many states have enacted assignment statutes; this article does not address
the laws of other states.
Commencement of an Assignment Proceeding - An Overview
An Assignment Proceeding is commenced when the Debtor irrevocably assigns all
of its assets and liabilities to an Assignee of its choice, which assets are to
be held and administered for the benefit of the creditors of the Debtor.
In Florida, the statutory form of the assignment document provides for the
transfer of all of the Assignors' assets to the Assignee, "except such
assets as are exempt by law from levy and sale under an execution."(--1)
The assignment document directs the assignee to "take possession and
administer the estate, liquidate the assets of the estate with reasonable
dispatch and convert the estate into money,... and pay and discharge all
reasonable expenses,... then pay and discharge in full, to the extent that funds
are available in the estate after payment of administrative expenses... all the
debts and liabilities now due from the assignor."
After the Debtor assigns its assets and liabilities to the Assignee and after
the assignment documents are executed, the Assignee files a Petition for
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors in state circuit court. The Assignee
then takes physical possession of all the assets and notifies creditors of the
date by which claims must be filed. The claims bar date is 120 days from the
date of the filing of the Petition(--2).
After filing the Petition and taking possession of the assets, the Assignee
must perform the following functions, among others:
(1) give notice of the commencement of the Assignment Proceeding to all known
creditors by mail and by publication in a local newspaper;
(2) within 30 days of the filing of the Petition, the Assignee must conduct
an examination of a representative of the Assignor concerning the acts, conduct,
assets, liabilities and financial condition of the Assignor and any other matter
related to the Assignee's administration of the estate(--3);
(3) collect and liquidate the assets of the Debtor;
(4) pursue claims and causes of action that the Debtor may have against third
parties, including collection actions, fraudulent transfer actions and, if
necessary, actions seeking turnover of property of the Debtor;
(5) evaluate and determine the amount and validity of claims of creditors,
and object to claims if necessary;
(6) distribute funds to creditors with allowed claims in the following
priority: Class 1 - secured creditors, Class 2 - administrative creditors,
including the Assignee and his or her professionals, Class 3 - tax claims, Class
4 - claims for wages, salaries, or commissions, earned within 90 days of the
filing date, but only to the extent of $2,000, Class 5 - claims for consumer
deposits (up to $900), and Class 6 - all other unsecured claims; and
(7) file a final report and close out the Assignment Proceeding.
Comparing an Assignment Proceeding to a Chapter 7 Filing
An Assignment Proceeding is generally more efficient, less costly, of shorter
duration, more successful in terms of the value received for the assets and
amounts paid to creditors and more tailored to the needs of debtors and their
creditors than a Chapter 7 filing. In short, an Assignment Proceeding offers the
best a Chapter 7 filing has to offer, without the attendant administrative and
economic constraints.
In an Assignment Proceeding, the Debtor has the ability to choose the party
it wants to be responsible for the liquidation of its assets. Of course, there
are limitations. An Assignee cannot be a creditor or an equity security holder
or have any interest adverse to the interests of the estate. Also, an Assignee
may not be a corporation. In a Chapter 7 filing, an independent trustee and the
United States Trustee's Office oversee the liquidation of the Debtor's
non-exempt assets.
An Assignment Proceeding is typically under less intense scrutiny than a
Chapter 7 case. Bankruptcy cases are supervised by bankruptcy judges who
specialize in insolvency cases, while Assignment Proceedings are generally
supervised by state circuit court judges whose expertise usually lies outside
the insolvency arena.
There is no "automatic stay" in an Assignment Proceeding. While the
assignment statute prevents unsecured judgment creditors from executing against
assets of the estate, the statute does not prevent creditors from commencing or
continuing litigation against the Debtor based on pre-assignment claims. Nor
does it prevent secured creditors from immediately exercising their rights in
collateral pledged by the Debtor. In the face of contested litigation or
difficult creditor relationships, particularly where a secured creditor is
involved, the lack of an automatic stay may render an Assignment Proceeding
meaningless.
The Assignee in an Assignment Proceeding lacks several of the powerful
weapons available to bankruptcy trustees under the Bankruptcy Code. For
instance, an Assignee has no authority to bring preference actions which are
available in traditional bankruptcy proceedings. Also, the assignment statute
does not contain a provision for assuming, curing and assigning executory
contracts or unexpired leases. This tends to limit the Assignee's ability to
negotiate the termination and/or sale of valuable contracts and leases.
The Assignee is powerless in preventing disgruntled creditors from commencing
an involuntary bankruptcy case against the Debtor, which could potentially
preempt the Assignment Proceeding. There are, however, several cases in which
bankruptcy courts have dismissed involuntary bankruptcy cases in favor of an
Assignment Proceeding when it is in the best interest of the creditors and the
Debtor to do so(--4).
Finally, as the Assignment Proceeding is outside of bankruptcy, an assignment
may avoid the stigma and, arguably, the attendant devaluation of assets
sometimes associated with bankruptcy filings.
Conclusion
An Assignment Proceeding is typically a simpler and less expensive form of
liquidation than a Chapter 7 filing. It can offer great advantages, as detailed
above. An Assignment Proceeding, however, may not be appropriate in all
circumstances. Any questions regarding the suitability of or issues relating to
an Assignment Proceeding should be directed to an attorney experienced in
addressing such issues.
________
(--1) § 727.104, Florida Statutes.
(--2) § 727.112(2), Florida Statutes.
(--3) § 727.107(3), Florida Statutes.
(--4) See, e.g., In re Sun Coast Broadcasters, 5 B.R. 719 (M.D. Fla. 1980).