California Case Summaries
September 1, 1999
Workers' Compensation Immunity Protects Owner and
Construction Manager from Direct or Vicarious Liability
Claims from Injured Subcontractor
Seth Schimmel - Tampa
813-227-8500
A subcontractor's injured employee, who has received workers' compensation
benefits, may not pursue tort claims for the same injury against the owner,
construction manager, and the construction manager's employer. Zamudio v. City
and County of San Francisco 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 664 (Cal. App. 1999).
The court held that the owner and the construction manager were not
vicariously liable; that an employee cannot avoid the limits of workers'
compensation through such a claim; and rejected claims that the owner and
construction manager were independently negligent. The court found neither the
owner nor the construction manager obligated to supervise the subcontractor's
work. The owner and/or contractor could be negligent only if they retained
control "over the operative details of the hired work."
Rejected Bidder Awarded Damages
Bill Grant - Orlando
407-244-1162
The Los Angeles County MTA solicited bids for construction with a minimum
goal of 30% DBE participation. The low bidder mistakenly marked the bid form
showing this subcontractor as a "broker"; a second bidder identified
this company as a "subcontractor." Unknown to the bidders, MTA had an
unwritten policy of giving 100% DBE credit for subcontractor work, but only 5%
credit for brokered work. Consequently, the low bidder's bid was rejected
because it failed to meet the DBE requirement. The low bidder recovered lost
profits, home office overhead and bid costs. The Appellate Court upheld the
award despite the lack of fraudulent intent by MTA. Kajima/Ray Wilson v. L.A.
County MTA, 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 348 (Cal.App. 1999).