Featured Publications

Artist Commissioned to Create Tillie K. Fowler Memorial Sculpture in Jacksonville

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – Rhode Island-based sculptor Brower Hatcher has been commissioned by the Cultural Council of Greater Jacksonville through its Art in Public Places Program to create an outdoor sculpture to honor the late Tillie K. Fowler. The artist was commissioned to commemorate the life and work of Fowler, a dedicated Jacksonville attorney and pioneering leader in local and national politics.

More

Holland & Knight's National Media and Communications Team Achieves Significant Victory in Groundbreaking Defamation Lawsuit

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Holland & Knight's national Media and Communications team celebrated a significant victory recently in the California Court of Appeal, which vacated a trial court order compelling the deposition of a journalist being sued for libel. The ruling clears the way for the dismissal of the underlying libel lawsuit and the recovery of defense fees.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Labor, Employment and Benefits
Newsletter - July 2000
 
In this Issue...
No Claim For Pregnancy-Based Discrimination When Worker Fired For Pregnancy-Related Absences
 
July 1, 2000
 
Marilyn J. Holifield- Miami

No violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) occurs when an employer fires a pregnant employee for excessive absences, even if those absences were the result of the pregnancy — unless the employer overlooks the comparable absences of nonpregnant employees. Under the PDA, the prohibition against sex-based employment discrimination in Title VII applies with equal force to discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions. And, the same analysis used in other Title VII sex discrimination lawsuits is required for a pregnancy discrimination claim.

In Armindo v. Padlocker, Inc. (11th Cir. April 20, 2000), Padlocker fired Carine Armindo, an entry level clerical employee, after she had missed six days of work during her three months of probationary employment. Armindo’s pregnancy-related illnesses caused five of the absences, and car trouble caused one. She also missed work for pregnancy-related reasons by arriving late or leaving early on nine other occasions during her probationary period. Padlocker’s employee manual, however, permitted employees to receive sick days off from work only after they had successfully completed their initial three-month term of employment, which Armindo had not done. Armindo’s absences and other missed time from work occurred before she completed her probationary term making her ineligible to receive sick days off from work.

Adhering to precedent, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the PDA did not require Padlocker to treat Armindo, who had missed work because of her pregnancy, with greater favor than a nonpregnant employee who missed work on account of a different medical condition.

In affirming summary judgment for Padlocker the Eleventh Circuit noted, “while the PDA requires the employer to ignore the pregnancy, the employer need not ignore absences, unless the employer likewise ignores the absences of nonpregnant employees.”

For more information please contact Marilyn J. Holifield at 1-888-688-8500 or at mholifie@hklaw.com.