Featured Publications

Holland & Knight Expands National Intellectual Property Practice With Addition of Patent Attorney Group in Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A prestigious group of patent litigators and prosecutors recently joined the Holland & Knight's Washington, D.C. office, significantly strengthening the firm's national Intellectual Property Practice Group.

More

Holland & Knight Announces Opening of Abu Dhabi Office to Better Serve Clients in the Region and Worldwide

Holland & Knight's law office in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, serves clients located or doing business in the Middle East as well as the surrounding regions of Africa, Central Asia, India and Pakistan.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Environment
Newsletter - Second Quarter 2001
 
In this Issue...
Rewarding Private Land Stewardship by Clay Henderson — Holland & Knight Consulting
 
July 19, 2001
 

The 2001 Florida Legislature took innovative steps to reward private land stewardship with the passage of the Rural and Family Lands Protection Act. The Act authorizes the creation of several new tools to compensate land owners for restricting the use of their property. In addition, the Act creates a new transfer of development rights program to promote protection of rural areas.

The Rural and Family Lands Protection Act is found at Section 61-64 or SB 1922, which authorized several new programs in the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The Act represented a rare alignment of agricultural and environmental interests that jointly supported the bill. The premise behind the new program is that good stewardship of forest lands promotes protection of wildlife habitat and watersheds. In addition, there is broad recognition that rural forestry lands are being converted to urban development at a pace of over 200,000 acres per year. The new program is designed to reward good stewards of the land by compensating them for various new types of conservation agreements.

The Act authorizes the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to make payments for four types of conservation agreements:

Conservation easements are perpetual restrictions on the use of land in order to promote protection of open space, watersheds, or wildlife habitat. They are currently authorized by statute and widely used as a tool in estate planning.

Rural lands protection easements are perpetual easements to retain the current agricultural or forestry use of land and prevent its subdivision or conversion to other uses. This agreement is designed to specifically protect agricultural lands.

Resource conservation easements are contracts for services to provide annual payments to landowners who actively improve habitat and water restoration on their lands. This program will reward property owners who go above and beyond legal requirements and who actively manage land for habitat enhancement.

Agriculture Protection Agreements are similar to conservation easements but are limited to a term of 30 years.

The Act was not funded by the legislature because they were caught up in publicly controversial issues relating to the desire to fund Preservation 2000, Everglades Restoration, and Florida Forever. Each of these programs, including the Rural and Family Lands Protection Act can be funding out of bonds approved by the voters as part of the Conservation Amendment in 1998. But the Act does authorize the Department to develop implementing regulations in anticipation of funding availability beginning July 1, 2002.

The second part of the act creates a transfer of development rights program for rural areas. The bill authorizes the Department of Community Affairs to designate five rural areas as pilot project. Each are must be between 50,000 to 250,000 acres in size. Amendments to the local government comprehensive plans would identify development zones and receiving zones. The object of the bill is to designate rural areas for development by utilizing credits from areas designated to remain rural.

Both aspects of the Rural and Family Lands Protection Act are designed to blunt criticism of growth management by rural interests. Many private landowners have long argued that they should be rewarded for good stewardship rather than lingering a concern that they will be adversely affected by regulation. In addition, many rural local governments have argued that they were being punished by the Growth Management Act. The new bill strives to give rural interests new tools to protect agriculture and open space plus direct development in suitable areas.