Featured Publications

Nicholas Milano Appointed Executive Partner of Holland & Knight's Fort Lauderdale Office

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – Holland & Knight Managing Partner Steven Sonberg has appointed Nicholas "Nick" Milano to serve as Executive Partner of the firm's Fort Lauderdale office. In this new role, Milano will be responsible for management of the office. He will focus his energy and talent on expansion of the office's core practice areas, which include real estate, hospitality, litigation, private wealth services, tax and corporate/M&A.

More

Holland & Knight's National Aviation and Shipping Transportation Practice Receives a No. 1 Ranking by Chambers USA

NEW YORK – Holland & Knight's national aviation and shipping transportation practice has once again received a No. 1 ranking in New York and the nation from Chambers and Partners for the 2008 Chambers USA – America’s Leading Business Lawyers guide. Building on over 150 years of transportation experience, Holland & Knight has the largest and most geographically diverse maritime practice of any law firm in the United States.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Government Contracts
Newsletter - June 2001
 
In this Issue...
New SBA Industry Codes: What Do They Mean for Small Businesses?
 
June 27, 2001
 

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) recently converted from Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) industry codes to North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) industry codes for purposes of establishing small business size standards by industry. The change could mean expanded opportunities for contractors to participate in federal small business programs.

NAICS, like its predecessor, SIC, is a system for classifying business establishments by type of economic activity. The rapid changes in the U.S. and world economies in the early 1990s brought SIC under increasing criticism for failing to accurately reflect significant emerging industries in the economy. NAICS is intended to standardize industrial classifications among the U.S., Canada and Mexico and to reflect the significant changes in technology and in the growth and diversification of services that have occurred since 1987 when SIC, which originally was developed in the 1930s, was last updated.

The cornerstone of NAICS is the classification of industries according to their use of similar production processes. The NAICS code structure was chosen to permit greater detail in classifying industries than was possible under the 1987 SIC code structure. NAICS gives special attention to production-oriented classifications for (a) new and emerging industries, (b) services industries in general (not addressed in detail under SIC), and (c) industries engaged in the production of advanced technologies.

The 1997 NAICS (United States version) designates 170 more industries than the 1987 SIC, with most of the increase occurring in the services industries. NAICS designates 149 more service industries; 14 more industries in the manufacturing sector; seven more in agriculture, forestry, hunting and fishing; two more in construction; one more in utilities and three less in mining. Eight new sectors were created from the 1987 SIC Services division, including new sectors for information; professional, scientific and technical services; health care and social assistance; real estate and rental and leasing; administrative and support; and waste management and remediation services. Additional new sectors were established to better classify other industries, such as the arts, entertainment, and recreation sector and the accommodation and food services sector.

Each of these new sectors contains many new production-oriented subsector industry classifications. For example, in the manufacturing sector, a new subsector was created for computer and electronic product manufacturing, which brings together industries producing electronic products and their components because of the inherent technological similarities of their production processes, and the likelihood that these technologies will continue to converge.

NAICS was adopted for use by the federal government in 1997. NAICS must be used by U.S. government statistical agencies that collect or publish data by industry for published federal statistical data relating to years beginning on or after January 1, 1997. NAICS also is widely used by state agencies, trade associations and other organizations. In 1999, the SBA announced its intention of converting to the NAIC standard, a change-over which took place on October 1, 2000, the beginning of the government's fiscal year.

What does this mean for businesses who wish to qualify (or continue to qualify) for federal small business programs? Most industries have the same size standard under NAICS as they did under SIC, because the conversion was not meant to change any size standard. The conversion did, however, identify many new industries, especially information technology related industries and services industries, that formerly were included in broader industry classifications. The expanded listing of industries under NAICS increases the opportunity for contractors to request SBA to change the size standard where it may be appropriate to set a larger size standard in a contractor's particular industry. The broader SIC classification may have included so many firms that SBA determined a relatively low size standard was appropriate. That conclusion may change under NAICS, where there are fewer companies within each classification.

The new subcategories of industries create an opportunity for contractors to request a change in the size standard for their industry, which they are permitted to do under SBA regulations (see 13 C.F.R. § 121.102). In reviewing size standards, SBA seeks to ensure that the standard is high enough so that no single firm within the standard would be dominant in the industry. No such review was done for the 170 new industries established under NAICS. Considering the fact that certain industry categories under SIC were divided into several new subcategories under NAICS, a larger size standard may be appropriate under a particular subcategory because the number of competitors has decreased under each of the subcategories, which increases the likelihood that one competitor dominates that subcategory under the present size standard.

Contractors that exceed the present size standard in an industry where a particular company dominates the market among firms that meet the small size standard may wish to consider submitting a request to the SBA to review the existing size standard. Requests may be submitted to: Mr. Gary M. Jackson, Assistant Administrator for Size Standards, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20416.

Given the conversion to NAICS by all federal agencies that collect or publish economic data, SBA's adoption of NAICS for size standards was inevitable. The increase in the number of industry categories under NAICS may provide contractors that do not meet the present small size standard with an opportunity to request and obtain an upward adjustment to the size standard applicable to their industry. This possibility is particularly present in the information technology and services industries, where the number of small business competitors has decreased within many of the subcategories established under NAICS.