Featured Publications

Labor, Employment and Benefits: Alert - February 6, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied an employer’s request for review of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which held that tipped employees spending more than 20 percent of their time performing related but non-tipped duties must be paid the full minimum wage for that time, without the tip credit.

More

Financial Institutions: Alert - January 31, 2012

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act impacted many investment advisers who previously were not registered.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Print Article
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Print Newsletter / Alert
Intellectual Property and Technology
Newsletter - September 1999
 
In this Issue...
No Records Found
"Phantom" Elements in Trademark Registrations Not Allowed
 
September 1, 1999
 

In a recent Federal Circuit Court, decision, the court upheld the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO) decision that marks with placeholders, phantom marks, are not allowed. International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) wanted to register three trademarks that contained placeholders, "XXXX," where additional words could be inserted, such as "LIVING XXXX FLAVOR, where the XXXX was a placeholder for "a specific herb, fruit, plant or vegetable." The court concluded that registration of "phantom" marks would not provide proper notice to other trademark users, since such marks would encompass numerous combinations, thus making a thorough and effective trademark search impossible. The court also agreed with the PTO that using phantom marks would result in many marks per registration application and that this would violate the Lanham Act requirement of one mark per application. In re International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., 51 U.S.P.Q.2d 1513 (Fed. Cir. 1999).

Related Practices