Federal Policies Encourage Flexibility in the Procurement of Intellectual Property Rights
February 4, 2002
The United States government is the world's largest purchaser of information
technology products and services. Federal spending was projected to grow beyond
the $45 billion budgeted for the last fiscal year before the September 11
terrorist attacks created even more demand for IT products and services. With
the continued soft demand found in many sectors of the economy, the size and
scope of the federal marketplace have attracted more attention from IT providers
who have ignored the government contracts arena in the past.
This increased interest in the federal market comes at a time when the
government is looking for ways to expand its pool of IT contractors in order to
obtain increased competition, better prices and access to new technologies.
Starting with the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994, federal agencies
have established acquisition policies that more closely resemble the commercial
marketplace and that encourage the acquisition of commercial items and
components. Of special interest to IT providers is the recognition by many
federal agencies that they need not obtain the maximum license rights possible
to all of the software and technical data developed or delivered under
government contracts and grants.
The Department of Defense has taken a leading role in commercial acquisition
reform. A recent memorandum from the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition,
Technology and Logistics) set a goal that by FY 2005 half of all contract
actions by DOD agencies should be commercial acquisitions. In moving toward that
goal, the Department has taken a number of steps to make the government
procurement process more in line with commercial practices and less onerous for
commercial contractors.
As part of that process, DoD has established new guidelines for the
acquisition of intellectual property rights from its contractors. The agency
recognizes that while, in the past, DoD often led industry efforts in technology
development, recent years have seen military R&D spending drop in real
dollars terms. While private sector R&D spending has doubled since 1960 to
approximately two-thirds of the total U.S. amount, the military's share has
dropped from 53% to 16% of the total. DoD therefore has seen the need to
encourage commercial industry to collaborate with the government in research
efforts and "to acquire commercial products using commercially friendly
terms."
The new policy emphasizes the need for flexibility in the negotiation of
intellectual property rights and directs that the government should acquire only
data and rights to such data that are truly needed for a given acquisition. That
policy direction is reflected in a guidebook to assist government officials in
negotiating intellectual property rights with potential contractors, and
especially with "nontraditional commercial industry." The guide,
"Intellectual Property: Navigating Through Commercial Waters: Issues and
Solutions When Negotiating Intellectual Property with Commercial Companies"
has been promulgated to government contracting officers, program managers, and
other target audiences in the government and in industry. It can be found at
http://www.acq.osd.mil/ar/index.html.
The guide provides a good overview of the laws and regulations affecting the
government's acquisition of intellectual property, discussing patents,
copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, technical data and computer software. Of
even more importance, however, is the guide's annunciation of the "core
principles" when dealing with industry regarding intellectual property. The
guide stresses the need to recognize the value of intellectual property to
contractors, to identify the government's true needs for the intellectual
property, and to maintain flexibility in the negotiation of intellectual
property rights. The guide even lays out particular problem areas, presents the
concerns of both the contractor and the government, and offers possible
solutions.
The document is a guide, not a mandatory directive. However, it forms the
basis for an ambitious DoD outreach and training program to incorporate the
principles articulated in the guide into the federal procurement process.
Contractors negotiating intellectual property rights with the government would
be well advised to become familiar with the guide. The guide provides a basis
for supporting a contractor's need and right to protect its intellectual
property and gives alternative methods for safeguarding those rights. Some of
the guide's contents may be open to question. However, in the hands of a person
knowledgeable in the area of intellectual property rights, the guide provides a
useful tool in the contract negotiation process.
For more information, contact Frank Peterson at 888-688-8500 or via e-mail at
fpeterso@hklaw.com.