Featured Publications

Holland & Knight Ranked a Top Law Firm for Director Liability Issues by Directors & Boards Magazine

For the second year in a row, Holland & Knight has been ranked one of the nation’s top law firms for dealing with director liability issues, according to a survey released by Directors & Boards magazine.

More

Compliance Services: Alert - November 21, 2008

On November 12, 2008, the FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) Councils issued a final rule that further amends the FAR to amplify existing compliance program provi­sions (Subpart 3.10) and clauses (52.203-13 and 52.203-14). The rule also adds requirements that contractors and subcontractors disclose certain violations of criminal law, violations of the civil False Claims Act, and significant overpayments. The new rules take effect on December 12, 2008.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Real Estate
Newsletter - 2nd Quarter 2002
 
In this Issue...
 
Why State "Time Is of the Essence?"
 
April 29, 2002
 
Tara A. Scanlon- Washington

The boilerplate in most real property leases and contracts of sale or purchase states that "time is of the essence." This phrase may seem redundant when the lease or other contract contains specific deadlines for when the parties have to perform certain obligations, and sets forth an outside date for performance.

However, this simple clause is "magic language" without which courts in certain states will not strictly enforce deadlines in a lease or a contract for the sale of real property, and will infer that obligations such as the obligation to close may be performed within a reasonable period of time, using the stated deadlines merely as guidelines rather than absolute commitments.

For example, in Wendell W. Wood v. Elva W. Wood, individually and as executrix, etc., 216 Va. 922; 224 S.E. 2d 159 Supreme Court of Virginia, the court held that "Equity has established the rule that in contracts for the sale of real estate, time is not of the essence unless expressly stipulated in the agreement, or it necessarily follows from the conduct of the parties or the nature of the circumstances of the agreement." Sims v. Nidiffer, 203 Va. 749, 752, 127 S.E. 2d 85, 87 (1962). The intention of the parties, as demonstrated by their words and acts is a controlling factor. And, the intention to make time essential will not be inferred from the mere appointment of a date for delivery of the deed or payment of the purchase price. Morris v. Harrop, 152 Va. 127, [***7], 135, 152 S.E. 343, 345 (1930).

One may not always rely on deadlines in a lease or contract for the sale of real property without the simple phrase "time is of the essence as to the obligations of the parties under this agreement." Heavily negotiated, clearly articulated and mutually agreed upon deadlines can be nullified, despite the best intent of the parties during the negotiation process, without this simple but essential language.

For more information, contact Tara A. Scanlon at 888-688-8500 or via e-mail at tscanlon@hklaw.com.