Featured Publications

Steven Wright Appointed Executive Partner of Holland & Knight's Boston Office

BOSTON – Holland & Knight Managing Partner Steven Sonberg has appointed Steven Wright to serve as Executive Partner of the firm's Boston office. Wright will oversee the day-to-day management of the office and focus on expansion of the core practices in the office, which include litigation, IP, healthcare, real estate, corporate/M&A and bankruptcy.

More

Nicholas Milano Appointed Executive Partner of Holland & Knight's Fort Lauderdale Office

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – Holland & Knight Managing Partner Steven Sonberg has appointed Nicholas "Nick" Milano to serve as Executive Partner of the firm's Fort Lauderdale office. In this new role, Milano will be responsible for management of the office. He will focus his energy and talent on expansion of the office's core practice areas, which include real estate, hospitality, litigation, private wealth services, tax and corporate/M&A.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Real Estate
Alert - February 19, 2004
 
In this Issue...
Client Alert: Maryland Bill Seeks to Impose Tax on Economic Transfers
 
February 19, 2004
 

The Maryland House of Delegates introduced a bill designated as H.B. 1, entitled the “Public School Construction Assistance Act of 2004,” that would impose transfer and recordation taxes on transfers of 80 percent or more of the economic interests in entities that primarily own real estate in Maryland.  The bill was assigned to the Ways and Means Committee and to the Appropriations Committee of the House of Delegates on January 23, 2004.  If passed in its current form, the law would take effect on January 1, 2005.

Presently, transfers of economic interests are not subject to Maryland’s transfer and recordation taxes and real property transactions are often structured as sales of partnership, corporate or limited liability company interests in order to avoid these taxes, which are significant (for example, total state and county transfer and recordation taxes in Montgomery County, Maryland are an aggregate of 2.19 percent).  H.B. 1 would severely limit the ability to structure transactions in this manner to avoid Maryland’s high transfer and recordation taxes.

This bill is the latest in a series of similar bills, all seeking to close this perceived loophole.  A pair of similar bills, H.B. 19 and S.B. 120 of the 2003 legislative session, nearly passed last year and the expectation is high that the current H.B. 1 will pass this year. 

A description of the status of the bill and a link to the bill text can be found at: http://mlis.state.md.us/2004rs/billfile/hb0001.htm.

For more information, e-mail Curtis L. Sano at curtis.sano@hklaw.com, David L. Winstead at david.winstead@hklaw.com, Robert L. Gorham at robert.gorham@hklaw.com, or Joseph B. Whitebread at joseph.whitebread@hklaw.com, or call toll free, 1-888-688-8500.