The Kenergy Case: Why Conducting FCC License Due Diligence in Mergers and Reorganizations Is so Important
July 31, 2001
Companies considering the acquisition of, or merger with, another entity
typically conduct extensive due diligence examinations of the target entity.
Often, however, corporate lawyers neglect to inquire whether the target entity
holds any FCC licenses. It simply does not occur to many people that retailers,
hotels, golf courses, commercial buildings, manufacturers and numerous other
entities hold FCC licenses for devices ranging from rooftop satellite antennas
and mobile voice handsets to remote-control sprinkler systems and private
wireless data links. Under federal law, these FCC licenses may not be
transferred to another entity without the prior approval of the FCC.
A recent FCC enforcement decision highlights the importance of determining
whether a corporate deal involves an FCC license. It is a cautionary tale, and a
reminder that any due-diligence checklist should routinely contain a provision
for examining FCC licenses.
The case, Kenergy Corp., DA 01-181 (released Jan. 31, 2001), involved
an electric distribution cooperative in Henderson, Kentucky. Kenergy was
established in July 1999, through the consolidation of Henderson Union Electric
Cooperative Corp. (Henderson Union) and Green River Electric Corporation (Green
River), both of which held various FCC wireless licenses.1 The
consolidation resulted in the transfer of control of 56 FCC licenses, and thus
required prior Commission consent pursuant to Section 310(d) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ยง 310(d). Section 310(d)
provides:
No construction permit or station license, or any rights thereunder,
shall be transferred, assigned, or disposed of in any manner, voluntarily or
involuntarily, directly or indirectly, or by transfer of control of any
corporation holding such permit or license, to any person except upon
application to the Commission and upon finding by the Commission that the
public interest, convenience, and necessity will be served thereby.
Henderson Union and Green River failed to file applications for consent to
assign the licenses prior to their actual transfer to Kenergy. In fact, they did
not file the required applications until November 2000. The applications were
subsequently granted, but the FCC's Enforcement Bureau initiated an
investigation of the matter.
In a consent decree reached with the FCC earlier this year, Kenergy agreed to
make a $7,500.00 voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury. In
addition, the company agreed to implement a comprehensive internal compliance
program to ensure Kenergy's future compliance with the Communications Act.
For want of a brief investigation, Kenergy cost itself a substantial fine, a
public admonishment, and untold legal fees in dealing with the Enforcement
Bureau for three months. Had Kenergy filed the required applications at the
appropriate time, it would have paid the far more reasonable FCC application
fees, currently around $50.00 per call sign for the licenses at issue.
The Kenergy decision is not an isolated one. Since December 1999, the
Enforcement Bureau has issued 20 enforcement decisions for unauthorized
transfers of control. Recently, as a result of an Enforcement Bureau
investigation, Waste Management Holdings, Inc. entered into a $75,000.00 consent
decree for violating the transfer rules.2
Even internal reorganizations involving a change in ownership of an FCC
license must be approved by the FCC. In many instances, there is no FCC
application fee for an internal transfer of control, but the FCC still must be
notified and grant prior approval of the transfer.
The services involved Private Operational-Fixed Microwave and
Industrial/Business operations, governed by Parts 90 and 101 of the FCC's
rules contained in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
In re Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order,
DA 01-1040 (rel. Apr. 23, 2001); see also In re Citicasters Co., Forfeiture
Order, DA 01-823 (rel. April 4, 2001) (in which Citicasters was issued a
$25,000.00 forfeiture for violating the transfer rules).