Featured Publications

Holland & Knight's Jennifer Hernandez Named One of the 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America

SAN FRANCISCO – Jennifer Hernandez, a partner in the firm's San Francisco office, was named one of the 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America for 2008 by the National Law Journal. Lawyers selected to the list have had a national impact in their legal fields and beyond during the past five years, demonstrated the power to change the law, shape public affairs, launch industries and accomplish large projects.

More

Artist Commissioned to Create Tillie K. Fowler Memorial Sculpture in Jacksonville

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – Rhode Island-based sculptor Brower Hatcher has been commissioned by the Cultural Council of Greater Jacksonville through its Art in Public Places Program to create an outdoor sculpture to honor the late Tillie K. Fowler. The artist was commissioned to commemorate the life and work of Fowler, a dedicated Jacksonville attorney and pioneering leader in local and national politics.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Telecommunications
Newsletter - 2nd Quarter 2004
 
In this Issue...
Is State Excise Taxation of VOIP Services on the Horizon?
 
June 21, 2004
 

Freedom from some state and local communications excise taxation soon may no longer be one of the advantages of Voice-Over-Internet-Protocol (VOIP) services. The New York State Public Service Commission (NY-PSC) has just issued a decision classifying Vonage Holdings Corporation, a provider of VOIP services that utilize the public Internet, as a “telephone corporation.” While not a tax decision per se, this decision has tax implications for both service providers and end-users.

The proceeding was initiated by a complaint from a competing certificated telephone company that, among other things, asserted that Vonage should be required to collect from its customers state and local sales taxes and 911 surcharges. Like Vonage in this case, VOIP service providers have frequently taken the position that they provide information services, not telecommunications services. VOIP service providers that obtain capacity from third party carriers often pay excise taxes as an end-user, without obtaining a resale exemption that may be available for the purchase of services on a wholesale basis. The service providers then assert that they need not subsequently collect telecommunications excise taxes from their own customers.

There will be further proceedings in the Vonage case. The NY-PSC, while ordering Vonage to apply for a certificate of public convenience and necessity and file for a tariff, also invited Vonage to seek waivers of applicable regulations, and the NY-PSC will not enforce regulations against Vonage pending actions on the waiver requests. This matter is therefore not finally resolved in New York, but New York is far from alone in giving increasing regulatory attention to VOIP-based services. The Federal Communications Commission and many state public service commissions are now considering the appropriate regulatory classification of VOIP services, so this issue, and its relevance to telecommunications tax assessment, is unlikely to disappear soon.

Whether or not a specific state and local telecommunications tax applies to particular VOIP-based services of course depends on the wording and enforcement of the particular state law. We may expect, however, that many state and local governments will seek to impose telecommunications excise taxes on VOIP-based services. Both service providers and end-users should therefore begin to evaluate the implications of possible regulatory and tax policy changes on eligibility for tax exemptions and on the total prices paid for VOIP-based services.

For more information, e-mail Helen E. Disenhaus at helen.disenhaus@hklaw.com or call toll free, 1-888-688-8500.