Featured Publications

Holland & Knight Expands Depth of Financial Services Practice Group on the West Coast With Addition of Two Public Finance Attorneys in San Francisco

SAN FRANCISCO – Holland & Knight has expanded the firm's Financial Services Practice Group on the West Coast with the recent additions of public finance lawyers Edsell M. "Chip" Eady, Jr. and Henry C. Har to the firm's San Francisco office. Eady and Har were previously in the San Francisco office of Nixon Peabody.

More

Dan Coffman Joins Holland & Knight's National Labor, Employment and Benefits Practice Group in Jacksonville

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – Highly respected Jacksonville labor and employment attorney Dan Coffman has joined Holland & Knight's Jacksonville office as Of Counsel in the firm's national Labor, Employment and Benefits Practice Group. Prior to joining the firm, he was a founding partner at Coffman, Coleman, Andrews & Grogan in Jacksonville.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Labor, Employment and Benefits
Newsletter - March 2008
 
In this Issue...
 
English Only in the Workplace
 
March 5, 2008
 
Guy Farmer - Jacksonville

Many employers have increasingly diverse work forces. One issue that arises is whether an employer may impose an “English only” rule.

The EEOC’s 1980 “Guidelines on Discrimination Because of National Origin” addresses when an employer’s English-only policy is presumed to violate Title VII, 29 CFR §1606.7. The EEOC’s guidelines govern two types of English-only policies: policies applied at all times and policies applied only at certain times.

Because the EEOC considers a person’s primary language to often be an essential national origin characteristic, it believes that prohibiting employees from using their native language in the workplace at all times may create a discriminatory work environment. But, English-only policies that are applied only at certain times when there is a business necessity are normally acceptable.

The courts are split on English-only policies; some follow the EEOC guidelines while others do not. It is, however, clear that any employer that wants to adopt an English-only policy must first identify the business necessity for the policy and then adopt a policy that meets that need.

Although every employer’s situation is different, the following is an example of a part-time English-only rule that would appear to be acceptable to most federal courts as based on business necessity:

1. XYZ Corporation does not have a general English-only policy and employees may usually speak whatever language they chose.

2. However, XYZ Corporation expects employees to speak English in all of the following situations:
- when communicating or working with fellow employees, supervisors and managers who speak only English
- when necessary to promote safety
- when necessary to promote efficiency
- when directed or asked to do so by a supervisor, fellow employee or customer

As with other workplace rules, an English-only policy should be communicated to all employees in writing prior to its enforcement. You should check with counsel regarding the applicable local and state laws and regulations prior to implementing an English-only rule.

For more information, email Guy O. Farmer II at guy.farmer@hklaw.com or call toll free, 1.888.688.8500.