Featured Publications

Hospitality Industry: Hotel Technical Services Agreements Alert - May 10, 2012

In any new-build hotel or resort project, the brand agrees to provide certain planning, equipping, design and opening services to the project owner or developer for a technical services fee. The most important goal of the technical services agreement (TSA) is to ensure that when completed, the hotel or resort will comply with the brand standards and be operationally efficient.

More

Education: Alert - May 17, 2012

Every university, college or educational institution that operates a broadcast station must renew its federal broadcasting license. Failure to file a license renewal application on time may cause significant regulatory problems, including possible loss of license.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page

Articles & White Papers
Education

New Title II Regulations Regarding Direct Threat: Do They Change How Colleges and Universities Should Treat Students Who Are Threats to Themselves?
 

NACUANOTES

November 1, 2011
 
Paul Lannon - Boston

Education Partner Paul Lannon, chair of the firm's Non-Competes, Trade Secrets and Defecting Employees Team, and Associate Elizabeth Sanghavi authored a NACUANOTES article titled "New Title II Regulations Regarding Direct Threat: Do They Change How Colleges and Universities Should Treat Students Who Are Threats to Themselves?"

Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability, including mental illness. But for years, colleges and universities have understood – based upon government guidance – that they could nonetheless dismiss or discipline disabled students who are "direct threats" to themselves, without running afoul of federal antidiscrimination laws. The article reports that institutions are now reexamining this position in light of new federal regulations that expressly recognize an institution's ability to discipline or dismiss students that pose direct threats to others, but omit any reference to direct threats to self. In the article, Mr. Lannon and Ms. Sanghavi review the Department of Justice's (DOJ) new direct threat regulation under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the U.S. Department of Education's past threat-to-self cases and relevant case law, and suggest some approaches for developing involuntary withdrawal policies and removal protocols to comply with Title II.

They conclude that until the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) or the DOJ issues guidance regarding the removal from campus or dorms of students who pose a direct threat to themselves, or their exclusion from other programs, colleges and universities with emergency removal and involuntary leave policies should ensure that their policies follow the core non-discrimination principles outlined previously by OCR and the courts, even if a direct threat analysis is no longer used explicitly.

Related Practices