Featured Publications

Maria Currier Named Chair of Holland & Knight's National Health Law and Life Sciences Team

MIAMI – Maria Currier, a partner in Holland & Knight's Miami office, was named chair of the firm's national Health Law and Life Sciences Team, one of the largest health law and life sciences teams in the U.S.

More

Holland & Knight Expands Depth of Financial Services Practice Group on the West Coast With Addition of Two Public Finance Attorneys in San Francisco

SAN FRANCISCO – Holland & Knight has expanded the firm's Financial Services Practice Group on the West Coast with the recent additions of public finance lawyers Edsell M. "Chip" Eady, Jr. and Henry C. Har to the firm's San Francisco office. Eady and Har were previously in the San Francisco office of Nixon Peabody.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Government Contracts
November 20, 2001
 
In this Issue...
 
Contracting with the U.S. Air Force
 
November 20, 2001
 
David Dempsey - Northern Virginia

On October 5, 2001, the U. S. Air Force issued a memorandum calling for "rapid, agile contracting support" during "Enduring Freedom," and specifically identified the following authorities and methods available to Air Force "acquisition warriors" in support of the Campaign.

  • A contracting officer need not submit a synopses of proposed contract action when such disclosure would compromise national security; or when contracting without full and open competition (or for purchases conducted using simplified acquisition procedures, if unusual or compelling urgency precludes competition to the maximum extent practicable) and the government would be seriously injured if an agency complies with proposed contracting action notice requirements. See Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), §§ 5.202, 5.203, 6.302.

  • A contracting officer may look to authorized exemptions to competitive contracting necessitated by an "unusual and compelling urgency," and when full and open competition is determined not to be in the interest of national security or the public interest. See FAR §§ 6.302, 6.303.

  • Letter contracts may be used when the government’s interests demand that a contractor be given a binding commitment so that work can begin immediately. See FAR § 16.603.

  • Oral requests for proposal are authorized when processing a written solicitation would delay the acquisition of supplies or services to the detriment of the government. See § FAR 15.203.

  • The use of Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity task orders allows for the placement of orders using any medium specified in a contract. Also, when an agency’s need for supplies or services is urgent, the agency may utilize the fair opportunity process exception when placing an order in excess of $2,500. See FAR § 16.505.