Featured Publications

Holland & Knight's Real Estate Section Adds David Allswang in Chicago

CHICAGO – David B. Allswang has joined Holland & Knight's Chicago office as a partner in the firm's Real Estate Section. Allswang concentrates his practice in the area of real estate law, with an emphasis on commercial leasing on behalf of landlords and tenants.

More

Mid-Atlantic: Corporate M&A: Alert - July 2, 2008

Although many busy corporations view annual meetings as an inconvenient formality, holding annual meetings in Virginia is both a legal requirement of corporate governance and a beneficial tool to effectively manage the corporation’s affairs. To efficiently address business issues and prevent the liability protections of the corporate entity from being “pierced” in litigation, it is important that corporations take the time to properly hold and record all required meetings.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Real Estate
Newsletter - 2nd Quarter 1999
 
In this Issue...
D.C. Bond Financing Opportunities
 
June 1, 1999
 

Tax-Exempt Bonds

Tax-exempt bonds are issued by state or local governmental bodies, and the bond proceeds usually are loaned to borrowers to achieve a purpose authorized under both D.C. and federal tax laws. In the District of Columbia, those purposes are broad, and every type of for-profit and nonprofit entity can be borrowers.

Bonds aren't magic: they come in all shapes and sizes and can be tailored for individual fit. Their marketability is based on the perceived quality of the source for their repayment. In D.C., there is no statutory requirement for any specific type of security for bond repayment, i.e. a deed of trust or assignment of leases, so bonds can be secured in any manner which the borrower determines will make them saleable. Therefore, major trade associations, charitable nonprofits and businesses can market bonds secured merely by their general credit and not by a pledge of specific assets.

Don't be confused by references to "floaters," "put bonds," "multi-modal" or "credit-enhanced" bonds. Financial ingenuity knows no bounds, but it all comes down to having sufficient creditworthiness to entice financial institutions and/or bond purchasers to take a level of risk in return for their reward. Follow this general rule: if you can get a loan from a financial institution to finance your project, you can finance it with bonds at a lower interest rate.

The ability to finance facilities with tax-exempt bonds under federal tax law requires either the construction or acquisition and rehabilitation of the facilities be caused or "induced" by the availability of tax-exempt financing. In order to finance new construction for for-profit entities, it's important that the D.C. Chief Financial Officer preliminarily approves your project not less than 60 days after you take any major step which evidences your commitment to it, i.e. signing a real estate purchase contract, construction contract or other binding agreement. The same type of "inducement" can be performed by exempt organizations by adopting a resolution or unanimous consent to memorialize its intent to finance costs with tax-exempt bonds. All funds which are paid, and all obligations incurred, after the adoption of such an official "inducement resolution" will be reimbursable with proceeds of tax-exempt bonds issued at a later date.

In order to finance the acquisition of existing property with tax-exempt bonds, it is necessary for the acquirer to be a new tax owner of the property for federal tax purposes, so proceeds of tax-exempt bonds cannot be used merely for refinancing an existing owner's debt. It is possible to change tax ownership to a new entity but not cause the existing owner to lose control of the new entity, i.e. retain the position as managing general partner in a partnership or managing member in an LLC. Change of tax ownership necessitates creation of new capital basis in the property, which may be unattractive to long-term owners with low bases. Once tax ownership changes, existing property acquired by a for-profit entity is eligible for tax-exempt financing as long as not less than 15% of the acquisition cost of any buildings so acquired and not less than 100% of the acquisition cost of any equipment so acquired, in each case, is spent on capitalizable costs of such items within two years after acquisition with bond proceeds and a nonprofit entity is eligible for tax-exempt financing as long as it is owned by the nonprofit, which carries out a charitable activity with the bond proceeds.

Enterprise Zone Bonds

At last, a government-sponsored financing tool which is labeled as "EZ" may prove to be so. The majority of the central business district in the District of Columbia has been designated as an "enterprise zone," which brings numerous benefits to those who develop or redevelop property there. Existing property which is acquired from an unrelated person after August 5, 1997, constitutes qualified enterprise zone property. For properties built or rehabbed after that date in the 65 census tract districts so designated, owners can obtain the following benefits: the option to cause up to $15MM of tax-exempt financing to be issued for qualifying projects; various employment tax credits for employees who live and work in D.C.; the right to expense otherwise depreciable business assets; and the exemption from federal capital gains taxes for real property, stock, partnership interests or other evidence of ownership of real property in the enterprise zone which is held more than five years. In addition, the requirements for acquiring existing property with bonds have been relaxed a bit for property financed by EZ bonds. Instead of needing to spend at least 15% of a building's acquisition cost and 100% of equipment's acquisition cost, only the greater of 15% of the basis of the acquired property or $5,000 need be spent.

The big opportunity is to get tax-exempt bonds issued to finance your project in an amount up to $15MM, rather than limited to $3MM as in the rest of the nation. Only "enterprise zone" projects are eligible, and are defined as any property (i) owned by a for-profit entity, which derives at least 50% of its business income from the active conduct of a trade or business in an enterprise zone, (ii) a substantial part of such entity's tangible property (likely a majority) is located and used in the enterprise zone and (iii) a substantial portion (likely a majority) of such entity's intangible property is used in the active conduct of its business. Rental apartments are excluded from participating (except in special situations), and commercial rental property must have at least 50% of its gross rental income produced by tenants which themselves satisfy the foregoing tests. Otherwise, any type of facility is financeable in the D.C. enterprise zone, and that gives D.C. a competitive advantage over its surrounding jurisdictions, which only are able to finance for-profit projects which constitute "manufacturing facilities" with private activity tax-exempt bonds.

The tests must be satisfied during the three tax years commencing after a "start up" period to get the project into compliance. The start-up period commences on the date that bonds are issued to finance a project and runs for no more than three years thereafter. Property in an enterprise zone is conclusively presumed to be qualified as long as the owner reasonably expects it to qualify at the end of the start-up period. After the end of the three year compliance period, no further tests need to be satisfied for properties in D.C. (a more liberal test than for enterprise zones outside of D.C., in which at least 35% of the employees in the project are required to be residents of certain poverty-struck areas).

(C)(3) Bonds

Tax-exempt bonds can be issued by D.C. for any type of charitable activity which is conducted by a nonprofit and which has been determined to be exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. These activities are not restricted to any particular area of D.C., have no relation to enterprise zones and need not consist of real estate or tangible property. In order to qualify for bond financing, not less than 95% of the bond proceeds must be spent on uses which constitute "exempt activities" and not "unrelated trades or businesses" under the federal tax laws. Therefore, facilities which are not more than 95% used by the nonprofit owner will not be able to be 100% financed with tax-exempt bonds. For example, a 501(c)(3) organization may occupy 70% of the space in a building, lease 10% of the space to an affiliated for-profit or trade association and lease 20% of the space to tenants which are unrelated to the nonprofit and which are not 501(c)(3) organizations having the same scope of charitable activities as the nonprofit owner. In this instance, only 70% of the acquisition and development costs of the facility can be financed with tax-exempt bonds, and the balance must be financed in another way, including taxable bonds.

D.C. will welcome exempt organizations that request tax-exempt bonds, since such bonds are not subject to any dollar limitation normally imposed by the federal tax code on bonds with respect to for-profits. Most nonprofits will want to finance capital facilities located in D.C. and which will add to the ad valorem tax base (until an application for exemption is submitted and acted on). It also is possible for intangibles and working capital to be financed with tax-exempt bonds. An interesting possibility: the needs of a national nonprofit, whose headquarters is located in D.C., may be able to be financed with minimal direct connection, either under the federal tax law or D.C. law, between the purpose for which bonds are issued and the benefits directly achieved by D.C.

Tax-Increment Financing

Costs of capital facilities owned by for-profit entities can be financed by D.C.'s issuance of tax increment bonds, which are repayable solely from dedicated portions of ad valorem and/or sales tax revenues generated within a specified tax-increment financing district and not from any source pledged by a for-profit owner of a facility. It may be possible for the district to be co-extensive with the individual project proposed to be financed. For-profit entities can obtain the benefit of such financing when D.C. or one of its governmental instrumentalities acquires land, pays for permitted "development costs" and all related financing, working capital, administrative and relocation costs, and sells the improved property to a private user for a price which is below the cost of such acquisition and improvements. "Development costs" include hard and soft costs of land acquisition, building demolition and/or rehabilitation, public infrastructure and facilities for parking, museums, educational institutions, retail, entertainment, recreation and housing (but not the cost of constructing new buildings for uses other than as summarized in this sentence). It is necessary to go through this governmental improvement and sale process in order to avoid having the tax increment bonds be treated either as "private-activity" bonds for federal tax purposes, which would limit their dollar amount to $10MM and their use for manufacturing facilities, or "enterprise zone" bonds, which would limit their dollar amount to $15MM and their use for qualified facilities only within designated enterprise zones.

In order for tax-increment bonds to be issued, an applicant must apply to the D.C. Chief Financial Officer (or to the National Capital Revitalization Corporation after it is activated) for certification that a proposed project complies with the D.C. Tax Increment Financing Authorization Act of 1998. The application needs to describe the proposed increment financing area, project, use of financing proceeds, financial feasibility of the project, zoning and comprehensive plan compliance and potential tax revenues from the project. If the CFO approves the project, the CFO is required to certify the project to the Mayor, who will transmit a resolution to the City Council approving the project if he determines it to comply with the requirements of the financing act. If the council approves the financing plan, it must determine the portion of the increases in pledged tax revenues which will be available to pay bonds secured by such sources, based on the D.C. Assessor's certification as to the initial assessed value of each lot of taxable property within the assessment area, and the D.C. Collector's certification as to the initial sales tax amount for the assessment area. Since the D.C. billing and collection information system can track increases in lot assessed valuation better than the source of sales tax revenues, it is likely that tax-increment bonds will be limited to being secured by ad valorem taxes until D.C.'s billing and collection system changes.

Tax-increment financing will not reduce the taxes paid by the owners of individual facilities; it merely will permit the use of a portion of their own tax revenues, together with taxes on other land and improvements located in the taxing district, to repay increment bonds. The process of negotiating approval of specific proposed projects, the boundaries of the increment district, the portion of taxes allocated to repayment of financing and other benefits to the property owner will be lengthy; however, financing will become more difficult to obtain when several bonds have been issued for facilities in the same district. This is one time when being a pioneer has its rewards, so get moving early.

There are more questions than answers about bond financing; call us with questions, and we'll find the answers.

Mr. Baber is a Partner in the Washington, D.C., office and can be reached at 202- 457-7169, or at bbaber@hklaw.com.