Featured Publications

Labor, Employment and Benefits: Alert - February 6, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied an employer’s request for review of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which held that tipped employees spending more than 20 percent of their time performing related but non-tipped duties must be paid the full minimum wage for that time, without the tip credit.

More

Construction: Alert - January 30, 2012

For almost 50 years, lessors have had the ability to limit their liability for liens that arose from improvements to the leasehold made by a lessee. However, in the most recent legislative session, the Florida Legislature enacted revisions to Florida Statute § 713.10 that provide a potential pitfall for lessors by inserting a provision that may allow a contractor to lien the lessor's interest even where there is a recorded document advising of the limitation of liens.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Print Article
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Print Newsletter / Alert
Real Estate
Newsletter - 3rd Quarter 2003
 
In this Issue...
No Records Found
Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Real Estate Deals
 
 May 13, 2003
 
David S. Kahn- Washington
Christopher Myers- Northern Virginia


The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the PATRIOT Act) requires that all “financial institutions” must establish anti-money laundering programs.  The term “financial institution” includes “persons involved in real estate closings and settlements.”  Another provision in the PATRIOT Act requires all financial institutions to affirmatively check business relationships against the lists of terrorists and other specially designated individuals and entities maintained by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC).1   The problem for real estate companies is that the term “persons involved in real estate closings and settlements” has never been defined.

On April 10, 2003, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCen), which will enforce the anti-money laundering provisions of the PATRIOT Act, issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on regulations covering “persons involved in real estate closings and settlements.” 

The issues for comment include: 

  • What are the money laundering risks in real estate closings and settlements?
  • How should “persons involved in real estate closings and settlements be defined?
  • Should any persons involved in real estate closings and settlements be exempted from the regulations?
  • How should anti-money laundering programs for persons involved in real estate closings and settlements be structured? 

As stated in the FinCen notice, the National Institute of Justice has reported that “real estate transactions offer excellent money laundering opportunities,” including opportunities to “legitimate and repatriate illegal funds.”  In addition, the American Land Title Association has identified numerous “red flag” situations involving real estate transactions.  

According to the notice, the “guiding principle” in defining “persons involved in real estate closings and settlements” will be to include “those persons whose services rendered or products offered in connection with a real estate closing or settlement that can be abused by money launderers.”  FinCen also intends to include “those persons who are positioned to identify the purpose and nature of the transaction” or “suspicious conduct.”  Another factor will be “involvement with the actual flow of funds . . .”  Persons who may be covered by the definition include: real estate brokers; attorneys who represent the purchaser or seller; banks, mortgage brokers, or other financing entities; title insurance companies; escrow agents;  appraisers; and such investment vehicles as real estate investment trusts, real estate limited partnerships, or entities commonly referred to as “syndicates” of real estate investors.  Interested parties have until June 9, 2003, to make comments to FinCEN.

The PATRIOT Act does not require a “one-size-fits-all” anti-money laundering program for real estate entities.  The notice of proposed rulemaking provides the real estate industry an opportunity for input on how anti-money laundering program requirements should be tailored or customized to address the unique needs or aspects of the real estate industry.

This notice of proposed rulemaking covering the anti-money laundering program component of the PATRIOT Act, will not affect the separate provision requiring all financial institutions to check the OFAC lists before engaging in transactions.  That requirement is in effect now.  In addition, Executive Order 13224 continues to prohibit all U.S. persons, including those in the real estate industry, from engaging in transactions with parties identified on the OFAC list.  These provisions are enforced through significant civil and criminal penalties, including substantial fines and potential prison terms. 

For more information, call James Rodio, Christopher Myers or David Kahn, toll free, at 1-888-688-8500.

 

 [1]       All US companies are also covered by Executive Order 13224, which prohibits any dealings, directly or indirectly, with any individual or entity on the OFAC list.

Related Practices