Featured Publications

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Class-of-One Theory of Equal Protection Does Not Apply to Public Employees

In a 6-3 decision issued on June 9, 2008, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s ruling that the class-of-one theory of equal protection does not apply in the public employment context. In Engquist v. Oregon Dep’t of Agric., No. 07-474, the plaintiff filed race, sex and national origin claims following her layoff and brought a class-of-one equal protection claim.

More

Franchise Laws and Hotel Management Relationships: A Rose by Any Other Name …

As the role of hotel management companies has evolved over time from the leasing and ownership of hotels, to entering into agency management agreements, to now entering into management agreements with no agency disclaimers, the relationship between the hotel owner and hotel management company has adopted several of the attributes of a franchise relationship. If the substance of these relationships are not kept distinct from that of a franchise, they may become subject to the obligations of franchise laws.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Labor, Employment and Benefits
Alert - November 27, 2007
 
In this Issue...
 
OSHA Final Rule on PPE Requires Employer Payment
 
 November 27, 2007
 
Howard Sokol - New York

OSHA

On November 15, 2007, after more than eight years on the drawing boards, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued its final rule concerning an employer’s obligation to pay for the personal protective equipment (PPE) used by its employees. The rule applies to employers in general industry, shipyard and marine terminals, longshoring and construction.

The rule will become effective on February 13, 2008, and employers will have to be in compliance with the new rule by May 15, 2008. Briefly, the new rule requires employers to provide and to pay for any PPE required under OSHA standards. However, employers will not be required to pay for or to provide replacements for lost or intentionally damaged PPE, even if previously paid for and provided by the employer. Also exempt from the payment requirement are every-day types of clothing (e.g., long sleeve shirts, long pants, street shoes, regular work boots, etc.); weather protective clothing (e.g., gloves, parkas, rubber boots, hats, etc.); and certain protective boots, shoes and eyewear. OSHA believes the new rule will assure employee use of required PPE; incentivize affected employers to supply satisfactory equipment that is in safe working order; and motivate affected employees to play an active role in developing and maintaining their employers’ safety and health programs.

For more information, email Howard Sokol at howard.sokol@hklaw.com or call toll free, 1-888-688-8500.