Featured Publications

Dan Coffman Joins Holland & Knight's National Labor, Employment and Benefits Practice Group in Jacksonville

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – Highly respected Jacksonville labor and employment attorney Dan Coffman has joined Holland & Knight's Jacksonville office as Of Counsel in the firm's national Labor, Employment and Benefits Practice Group. Prior to joining the firm, he was a founding partner at Coffman, Coleman, Andrews & Grogan in Jacksonville.

More

Environment: Alert - August 15, 2008

The Department of Interior and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration published a proposed rule on August 15, 2008, Vol. 73 Fed. Reg. 47868 significantly revising the Section 7 Consultation process under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the first time since 1986.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page
Labor, Employment and Benefits
Alert - January 7, 2008
 
In this Issue...
 
NLRB Revamps Communications Policy Pertaining to Email Communications
 
January 7, 2008
 
Frederick Braid - New York
Todd D. Steenson- Chicago

A sharply divided National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled for the first time that employees have no right to use an employer’s email system for union communications and that employers may maintain a policy prohibiting employee use of the employer’s email system for “non-job-related solicitations.” It further held that an employer can enforce such a rule even if the employer allows employees to use the email system for personal or charitable communications.

In so doing, the Board modified its previous standard for determining whether an employer has discriminatorily enforced its communications policies against union activity by finding that there must be a specific finding of discriminatory motive. In other words, nondiscriminatory policies uniformly enforced, which happen to embrace union communications as well, will not be found unlawful. Thus, an employer’s policy may lawfully permit numerous kinds of non-work-related communications while still banning solicitations for unions and similar organizations. Only if an employer bars union communications while allowing communications for similar organizations will it be found to have violated the law.

This decision confirms the right of employers to prohibit employee use of email for union purposes, thus validating the email policies many employers have adopted. It also makes clear that an employer can adopt a policy that allows limited non-business use of email, including limited personal use and solicitations on behalf of charitable groups, yet still prohibit emails relating to other organizations, including unions. However, email and communications policies must be drafted with care in order to take advantage of the Board’s new standard. In light of this significant decision, employers should review their email, employee communications and solicitation and distribution policies with counsel.

For more information, email Frederick D. Braid or Todd D. Steenson at fred.braid@hklaw.com or todd.steenson@hklaw.com, respectively, or call toll free, 1-888-688-8500.