Featured Publications

Private Wealth Services: Newsletter - November 2009

There has been considerable debate on Capitol Hill this year over the taxation of a Carried Interest in the context of a Private Equity Fund (PEF). At the same time, there has been public discussion of the role that the private equity industry will have in our economic recovery. In the realm of estate planning, PEF Principals possess unique opportunities to shift the performance of their interest in a PEF to future generations – potentially resulting in very significant estate tax savings. This article will review the basic PEF structure, describe the nature of a Principal’s interest in a PEF and indentify wealth transfer techniques that should be considered by a Principal.

More

Chambers USA Lists Holland & Knight Among Nation’s Top Law Firms, Earning Top Spots in Multiple Practice Areas and Markets

More than 100 Holland & Knight attorneys named America’s Leading Lawyers in 2009 Chambers USA Guide.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Print Article
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Print Newsletter / Alert
Environment
Alert - May 20, 2009
 
Stimulus Funding: Expediting NEPA Compliance for “Shovel-Ready” Projects in California
 
May 20, 2009
 
Jennifer Hernandez - San Francisco
Nicholas William Targ - San Francisco

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) and other federal financial programs make stimulus funding available to many “shovel-ready” projects, but they also require compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In California, NEPA compliance should not be an obstacle to funding. Shovel-ready projects can frequently achieve expedited NEPA compliance through use of Categorical Exclusions and focused Environmental Assessments. These projects can also rely on the information and analysis included in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents as the basis for satisfying NEPA requirements. Skillful use of these strategies can facilitate swift NEPA compliance and successful federal funding.

Specifically, we recommend use of the following NEPA compliance pathways for California shovel-ready projects:

    • Categorical Exclusions (CEs). Certain projects and activities that do not involve significant impacts are excluded from NEPA review. It is important to emphasize that NEPA Categorical Exclusions are broader than the CEQA Categorical Exemptions. Examples of projects that may be eligible for NEPA CEs include, among others: (1) bridge, sidewalk, park and street rehabilitation/reconstruction; (2) energy efficient and other green retrofits; (3) rehabilitation/reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings; (4) construction of bus shelters in commercial areas; (5) installation of low-water use landscaping; and (6) replacement of traffic signals and street lighting with energy efficient lighting technologies.
    • Focused Environmental Assessment (EA)/Finding of No Significant Impacts (FONSI). Efficient use of completed CEQA documents can dramatically speed NEPA compliance for other projects. The federal agency that disburses federal funds is required to complete NEPA documentation for qualifying projects, but the President’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) – the overarching federal agency charged with NEPA compliance across all federal agencies – recently issued an important guidance document encouraging the use of “Focused Environmental Assessments” along with “Findings of No Significant Impact” (EA/FONSI). Completed CEQA documents can be referred to, and briefly summarized in, an EA/FONSI to complete the NEPA process for these projects. This EA/FONSI compliance track should be available for most California projects eligible for federal funding, and both Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports can be used as a basis for the EA/FONSI. CEQ has prepared guidance for conducting streamline EAs.
    • Engage CEQ in the NEPA Compliance Process. CEQ staff can provide pragmatic NEPA compliance advice and resolve disagreements or conflicting policies if the NEPA process becomes delayed by the federal agency disbursing stimulus funding. Federal agency funding staff may be unfamiliar with NEPA and CEQA, and CEQ staff can help bridge that gap.

If skillfully used, these approaches can lead to timely NEPA compliance for most California shovel-ready projects.

For more information, contact:

California:

Nicholas Targ
415.743.6926
nicholas.targ@hklaw.com

Jennifer Hernandez
415.743.6927
jennifer.hernandez@hklaw.com

Washington, DC:

Richard Gold
202.457.7143
rich.gold@hklaw.com

Daniel C. Maldonado
202.419.2504
dan.maldanado@hklaw.com

Eve M. O’Toole
202.419.2505
eve.otoole@hklaw.com

toll free: 1.888.688.8500

Related Practices