Featured Publications

Labor, Employment and Benefits: Alert - February 6, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied an employer’s request for review of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which held that tipped employees spending more than 20 percent of their time performing related but non-tipped duties must be paid the full minimum wage for that time, without the tip credit.

More

Financial Institutions: Alert - January 31, 2012

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act impacted many investment advisers who previously were not registered.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Printer friendly
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Generate a PDF version of this page

Articles & White Papers

Court Expands Duty to Corporate Officers and General Counsel to Implement Compliance and Ethics Programs
 

Compliance and Ethics Magazine

October 1, 2008
 
Michael Mannix- Northern Virginia
Christopher Myers- Northern Virginia

In light of the recent Miller v. McDonald, et. al. decision, senior management must take steps to ensure that appropriate compliance program structures and activities are in place and operating or risk that corporate officers, and, in particular, the general counsel, can be held personally liable for corporate fraud and related wrongdoing. Please click on the link below to view the article.

This article, published in the October 2008 issue of Compliance and Ethics, appears here with permission from the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics.

READ: Court Expands Duty to Corporate Officers and General Counsel to Implement Compliance and Ethics Programs

Related Practices