Featured Publications

Labor, Employment and Benefits: Alert - May 16, 2012

A federal district court in Washington, D.C., ruled on May 14, 2012, that the National Labor Relations Board's revised union representation election rule that went into effect on April 30 is invalid because the NLRB lacked a quorum for the final vote that approved the rule.

More

Education: Alert - May 17, 2012

Every university, college or educational institution that operates a broadcast station must renew its federal broadcasting license. Failure to file a license renewal application on time may cause significant regulatory problems, including possible loss of license.

More

Search Our Library

Search

  • Print Article
  • Email this page to a friend
  • Print Newsletter / Alert
Labor, Employment and Benefits
Alert - March 18, 2011
 
U.S. Tax Court Ruling Underscores Need to Update and Amend Qualified Plan Documents to Reflect Changes in Federal Tax Laws
 
March 18, 2011
 
Richard J. Hindlian- Boston

A recent U.S. Tax Court case reminds employers of the importance of keeping qualified retirement plans updated for changes in the federal tax laws. In Christy & Swan Profit Sharing Plan v. Commissioner, T.C. No. 23853-09X, T.C. Memo. 2011-62 (March 15, 2011), the court considered whether a profit-sharing plan that was not amended for changes in the federal tax law was entitled to retain its tax-qualified status.

Background

The Christy & Swan Profit Sharing Plan was adopted in 1986 and received a favorable IRS determination letter in 1986. The IRS commenced an audit of the plan in June 2007, during which the IRS discovered that the plan was not amended to comply with the requirements of certain statutory enactments including those required by the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000 (CRA) and the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA).

The plan's trustee argued the plan was "amended" by general reference to incorporate all statutory and regulatory amendments necessary to retain qualified status under section 401(a), although no formal amendments were made to the plan document. The Trustee also argued that because the plan discontinued receiving contributions and barred admission of new participants in 2001, the plan ceased to exist and thereafter was not required to amend for the statutory enactments.

Court Decision and Significance

The court disagreed with these and all of the other arguments offered by the trustee. It held that because the petitioner's plan provisions were not amended to conform to statutory requirements, the IRS properly revoked the plan's tax-qualified status as a qualified profit-sharing plan under section 401(a) for 2001 and subsequent years.

This case underscores the need to keep qualified plan documents, such as 401(k) plans and profit-sharing plans, updated and timely amended for changes in the laws applicable to these plans.

Related Practices