The U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island ruled in July that a law firm shouldn't have to unilaterally withdraw from representing a long-term client if conflict should arise from lateral hires or mergers. This doctrine precludes firms from terminating representation of current clients in order to bring in attorney hires and their clients. Legal Ethics Attorney Allison Martin Rhodes weighed in on the so-called "hot potato doctrine."
"The hot potato doctrine can torpedo moves and mergers," Ms. Rhodes said. Ms. Rhodes noted that lateral hires or mergers by large law firms can create conflict over small latters, resulting in "a questionable balance of the equities."
READ: Conflicts of Interest: Hot Potato Doctrine Applies Before Lateral Joins Firm (subscription required)
Please note that email communications to the firm through this website do not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the firm. Do not send any privileged or confidential information to the firm through this website. Click "accept" below to confirm that you have read and understand this notice.