June 29, 2017

Highest and Best Use Valuation Not Required For Cramdown Purposes

Client Alert
Bruce J. Zabarauskas

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, has held that a lender’s collateral need not be valued at its highest and best use when determining whether a Chapter 11 debtor’s plan of reorganization should be crammed down over the lender’s objection.

READ: Highest and Best Use Valuation Not Required For Cramdown Purposes

Related Insights