Supreme Court Webinar: Upcoming Cases of Significance to Business
Holland & Knight Webinar
Please join Holland & Knight's Appellate Team for a webinar examining the U.S. Supreme Court and cases of particular significance to the business community. This webinar will provide a timely analysis of current legal issues and a unique perspective on cases that will be decided by the end of the term in June 2022. We will discuss the current term, next year's outlook, recent trends, new developments and what pending cases may tell us about the broader direction of the court.
Our speakers all have extensive experience in Supreme Court litigation and the regulatory and substantive areas of law that the court will address. Of special note, Mr. Agarwal served as a law clerk for Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh (when the latter was a U.S. Court of Appeals judge).
This program is designed for attorneys, in-house legal personnel and outside counsel, as well as executives with compliance responsibilities.
We hope you can join us for this highly informative presentation.
- Houston Community College System v. Wilson: Whether First Amendment limits local government's power to censure its members
- City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas, Inc.: Whether Austin's distinction between on-premises signs (may be digitized) and off-premises signs (may not) is a facially unconstitutional content-based regulation
- Carson v. Makin: Whether a state violates the religion clauses or equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution by prohibiting students participating in an otherwise generally available student-aid program from choosing to use their aid to attend schools that provide religious, or "sectarian," instruction
- Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C.: Whether compensation under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and several other statutes (such as the Rehabilitation Act and the Affordable Care Act) includes emotional distress damages
- American Hospital Association v. Becerra: Whether, under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has authority to adjust Medicare reimbursement rates for certain drugs to bring them in line with costs to providers to acquire those drugs and whether providers can sue to challenge the HHS practice
- Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation: Whether a rule addressing hospital Medicare reimbursement is valid under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA); this case turns on statutory interpretation and is likely relevant only to healthcare clients
- Gallardo v. Marstiller: Whether the federal Medicaid Act provides for a state Medicaid program to recover reimbursement for Medicaid's payment of a beneficiary's past medical expenses by taking funds from the portion of the beneficiary's tort recovery that compensates for future medical expenses
- Badgerow v. Walters: Whether a federal court has jurisdiction under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) to confirm or vacate an arbitration award when the only basis for jurisdiction is that the underlying dispute involved a federal question