As the debate over the future of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) continues, objectively verifiable statistics about how CEQA actually functions rarely enter the discussion. Holland & Knight addresses this with a report that provides stakeholders with intriguing new data about the law's recent litigation history.
The report analyzes all published opinions from 1997 through 2012 litigated to the California Court of Appeal or Supreme Court concerning the analytical validity of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration – or the applicability of a Categorical Exemption – under CEQA. It looks at the types of parties that file CEQA lawsuits, the kinds of projects that are targeted, the "win-loss" record of CEQA petitioners seeking to overturn an agency decision based on alleged CEQA compliance flaws, and the environmental study topics that California appellate courts most often consider in CEQA lawsuits.
Among the report's findings:
(This report is an expansion of two 2012 Holland & Knight publications: Analysis of Recent Challenges to Environmental Impact Reports and Judicial Review of CEQA Categorical Exemptions from 1997-Present.)
Please note that email communications to the firm through this website do not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the firm. Do not send any privileged or confidential information to the firm through this website. Click "accept" below to confirm that you have read and understand this notice.